Friday, February 15, 2008

The Black Community Is Dominated By Left Wing Ideologues - Case Study: The Loss Of US Rep Albert Wynn Of Maryland






During the flight back from a business trip I got a chance to read the latest edition of "Foreign Policy" magazine. There was an article that focused on the "anti-capitalist / anti-business / anti-free market" indoctrination that school students in France and Germany are exposed to and how the United States is so often the target of such attacks. Upon my completion of the article I had the opinion that if you crossed out "France and Germany" and substituted the words, thoughts and actions of the Black Quasi-Socialist Progressive-Fundamentalist Racism Chasers here in America that dominate Black political discourse there would be little difference between these two indoctrination operations.

As such upon driving home from the airport, listening to the radio I was none too surprised to hear that US Representative Albert Wynn of Maryland had lost his seat in the "Black general election" that was held in Maryland on Tuesday - also known as the Democratic Primary for the rest of the voters in Maryland. The radio reporter had commented that Wynn was punished for not being "left enough" and for supporting the Bush Administration too often. "George W. Bush" clearly a cuss word in the majority Black, solidly Democratic congressional district that was up for grabs.

I was most amazed that the victor in the battle, Donna Edwards campaigned with the message of "change". What I struggle with is the notion of "change" that she had promoted. "Change from what to what"? The net result is that this county has changed from one liberal Democrat over to a more extreme liberal Democrat.

In reading the goals as spoken by Rep Wynn I was reminded about the Foreign Policy magazine article that I had just read:

U.S. Rep. Albert R. Wynn (D-Md.), elected to Congress in 1992 as the nation's first representative of a majority-black suburban district, often argues that the best way to bring more constituents into the aspiring middle class is to promote small business and create jobs

It's why he hosts an annual job fair and another for local contractors who want business with the federal government. It's also why he says he voted in 2005 to repeal the estate tax and became a surprising advocate for casinos in Annapolis in 2003, thinking they would create more jobs than slot machines would.


From personal experience with Black politics it is clear to me that one man's economic opportunity in opening up the "Georgia Aquarium", for example, is another man's protest that the homeless people who frequent the area will be driven away as undesirables. The fact that the project would eventually lead to exponential job growth, a revitalization of the immediate area was of no consequence because, once again "the homeless" did not get any of these particular jobs and they are not presentable enough to sit in one of the new restaurants, bars or cafes that have popped up as a sign of life in this once underdeveloped area. Such as life when dealing with certain operatives.

For me as a Black man, attempting to understand the outright "voter nullification" that is going on across the nation among Black people who are resentful of the lack of development and opportunity in their own communities while coveting that which is going on in someone else's community - it is quite frustrating to me for certain people who are able to eschew the COSTS of the policies that they support and those which turn out to be quite poplar WITHIN the Black community. It is clearly the case that the COSTS of these policies is reflected in the ongoing grievances that many of these people face.

As the FP article states - there is a greater affinity for society/socialist based solutions to unemployment and needs among the "unfortunate". With their perverted logic the theory is that the corporations are the ones that created the poverty both while they were present in town - thus creating income imbalance and when they departed town - thus leaving the masses to strong alone. Either way you slice it - it is the corporation that did it both coming and going. It is the government program and regulations that are seen as the great fix to it all.

I am not surprised that Mr. Wynn's activities to produce jobs and employment in his district in Maryland was turned against him as a negative. This type of engagement is seen as "getting too comfortable with big business". In many Democratic or Black circles if you are not attacking businesses rather than complementing them - you are indeed out of tune with the masses.

In his 15 years in the House, Wynn's supporters say, he has been a vigorous voice for traditional Democratic causes, particularly raising the minimum wage, union protections for federal workers and proposals to expand health insurance for low-income children, vetoed by President Bush last year.


For reference - the above items represent Mr Wynn's "loyalty" to the Democratic party. These points are ordinarily good enough to rest upon.

But Wynn has also shown a willingness to step away from his party on some key issues, particularly, he has said, when driven by his philosophy on small and minority business, leading him to votes that have created an opening for challengers

Wynn's detractors say he votes too often with Republicans for a representative from an overwhelmingly Democratic district, which comprises portions of Prince George's and Montgomery counties.


This last point is CRITICAL to our discussion.
When a constituency has gone to indexing their judgments of their representative based on MEASURABLE PROPERTIES that are in line with their goals (ie: Has Educational Performance Increase, Is Crime Down, etc) over to "DID YOU VOTE IN LINE WITH THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY OR DID YOU VOTE WITH THE ENEMY".....you know that all is lost in this particular constituency. They have SOLD OUT and LOST THEIR SOUL. Gone is the independent judgment of "What are our collective goals and are we achieving them". Instead they have bought into the partisan jousting match and this has superseded their real best interests.

5 comments:

MIB said...

Another long-time Maryland incumbent congressman -- a Republican -- also lost in Maryland's GOP primary Tuesday for supposedly not being conservative enough. According to your thinking, 'White' Republicans are just as guilty of choosing partisanship over the common good as 'Black' people.

"... attempting to understand the outright 'voter nullification' that is going on across the nation among Black people... it is quite frustrating to me for certain people to eschew the COSTS of the policies that they support..."

The fact of their disagreement on politics with you isn't
"voter nullification" -- which is an attempt by voters to invalidate,
or refusal to enforce, a law. FWIW, voters chose Ms. Edwards over Rep. Wynn for they were dissatisfied with his performance (which kind of blows a hole through your 'Black people mindlessly support the Status Quo' meme).

"... there is a greater affinity for society/socialist based solutions to unemployment and needs among the 'unfortunate'.
With their perverted logic... the corporations are the ones that created the poverty..."


The logic of the underclass for attributing responsibility for the economies of their communities is no more "perverted" than your (previous) arguments for Black nationalism.

"I am not surprised that Mr. Wynn's activities to produce jobs and employment in his district in Maryland was turned against him as a negative."

Actually, Ms. Edwards successfully portrayed Rep. Wynn as autocratic and corrupt. Specifically, his votes supporting the invasion of Iraq and the current bankruptcy laws cost him a few friends.

Constructive Feedback said...

Excuse me MIB.....IS IT POSSIBLE that I DON'T CARE WHAT WHITE, RIGHT WING REPUBLICANS are doing? Is it legitimate for me to limit my scope upon the BLACK COMMUNITY, where the problems that I AM FOCUSED UPON are radiating in an unchecked matter?

You and others seem to gain comfort with the notion that "there are others in the MUD ALONG WITH YOU" and thus you don't do anything to stand up out of the mud and clean yourselves off.

The fact is that JOBS are what the people that are represented by the average Congressional Democrat Black Caucus member are demanding. Mr Wynn operated with this as his mandate BUT ALSO towed the Democratic line in the majority of his votes. It seems to me that the IDEOLOGY that dominates too many Black folks would see this type of job creating groundwork as being "too friendly toward businesses".....the same type of businesses that seem to MOVE AWAY once these type of people take control of a political region. Interesting coincidence.

White Republicans living with VOTER NULLIFICATION often have great schools, safe communities and economic development in their local areas. WHEN THIS IS THE CASE for the Black Community that is infected with Voter Nullification - I will go along with it. Instead you have communities that are far short of their collective goals and then RETRENCHMENT behind the policies that have FAILED THEM thus far.

MIB said...

"... IS IT POSSIBLE that I DON'T CARE WHAT WHITE, RIGHT WING REPUBLICANS are doing?"

It's obvious you don't care. I was hoping... against hope... you might be able to see that such willful dissonance undermines your credibility as a cultural critic.

"Is it legitimate for me to limit my scope upon the BLACK COMMUNITY, where the problems that I AM FOCUSED UPON are radiating in an unchecked matter?"

Intellectually speaking, no.

"You and others seem to gain comfort with the notion that "there are others in the MUD ALONG WITH YOU" and thus you don't do anything to stand up out of the mud and clean yourselves off."

I'm not, "in the mud" -- whatever it is you mean by that.

"The fact is that JOBS are what the people that are represented by the average Congressional Democrat Black Caucus member are demanding."

Thank you, Cap'n Obvious. The economy is the #1 concern of most voters, regardless of race, political persuasion, or party affiliation.

"Mr Wynn operated with this as his mandate BUT ALSO towed the Democratic line in the majority of his votes."

I wouldn't expect Rep. Wynn as a member of the Democratic Party to vote contrary to his party's politics often. Neither would I expect him to vote against the wishes of his constituents often. But I realize and accept both principles are subject to the compromises inherent in 'small-d' democratic politics. I suspect Rep. Wynn knew and understood the risks of his votes as well.

Knowing something about that district and Al Wynn personally, I reject your insinuations that a mystical 'anti-business' ideology among Black voters was the impetus behind his loss. The #1 item voters held him accountable for was his vote authorizing the President to use force against Iraq. Wynn was scandalized to a degree by his challenger -- an unmerited charge in my book (and identical to some of your half-baked demagogery) -- but the message of ejecting the status quo resonated with voters far more than any anti-corporatist sentiment.

You're using 'voter nullification' incorrectly. I gave you a proper definition so that you could re-phrase your argument to make sense.
Give it a try.

Constructive Feedback said...

Excuse me MIB - please allow me to quickly pick apart your comparisons between Albert Wynn and the Republican congressman who also lost his seat.

Let's talk about PREVAILING sentiment. Clearly the Democrats are trending "anti-war" and the GOP is standing behind the war.

You have Wynn having voted originally for the war and now has changed his mind about it and has profusely state this as his current position. HE is now IN LINE WITH the prevailing Democratic sentiment. Republican Wayne Gilchrest on the other hand originally voted for the war and has also turned against the war with his current position. Gilchrest was punished by the GOP voters for turning against what REMAINS the prevailing sentiment of the GOP.

I think we need to focus in on the ANTI-BUSINESS drivers that have lead to Mr. Wynn's demise as a Democratic representative. I have another article that I will post about how the two remaining Democratic presidential candidates have assumed the mantle of John Edwards and have increased their attacks on corporations recently.

News Paper article:
In the Maryland primary yesterday, Republican Congressman Wayne Gilchrest was defeated by a pro-war challenger.

Gilchrest voted for the Iraq War in 2003, but later said he regretted the decision. Gilchrest later criticized Bush’s handling of the war and became one of two Republicans (with Ron Paul) to vote last year for a withdrawal timeline.

The campaign against Gilchrest started just a few months after he took office for his ninth term and his challengers were heavily funded by pro-war establishment GOP leaders.

Constructive Feedback said...

"Is it legitimate for me to limit my scope upon the BLACK COMMUNITY, where the problems that I AM FOCUSED UPON are radiating in an unchecked matter?"

Intellectually speaking, no.
I'm not, "in the mud" -- whatever it is you mean by that.
[/quote]

I suspect that you have some difficulty with Intellectual Curiosity so let me break it down for you.

It is my opinion that the Black race in America IS NOT bound to the prevailing social norms and behaviors of AMERICA itself and in particular WHITE AMERICANS. While there may be some HUMAN natured responses in the way of "group behavior" the fact of the matter is that LEADERSHIP within this particular group which promotes that they operate in a manner that is OTHER THAN the default behavior can INDEED produce different results that turn out to be MORE EFFECTIVE than that which an unmanaged group will produce.

Thus my point is that I CAN INDEED have a different set of expectations for Black folks than I do for others. I can IGNORE the group behavior that White Republicans show as I focus on BLACK PEOPLE who operate IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF BLACK PEOPLE rather than in the best interests of DEMOCRATIC LOYALTIES.


[QUOTE]
"The fact is that JOBS are what the people that are represented by the average Congressional Democrat Black Caucus member are demanding."

Thank you, Cap'n Obvious. The economy is the #1 concern of most voters, regardless of race, political persuasion, or party affiliation.[/quote]

MIB - I can glad that you mentioned this. Now you open the door to the INSPECTION of the average Black Democratic Congressional Caucus member. If INDEED there is a quest for JOBS among their constituents how then does John Conyers, Stephanie Tubbs-Jones Charlie Rangel, William Clay and Gwen Moore retain their seats for they preside over districts that have VERY MUCH HIGHER THAN AVERAGE UNEMPLOYMENT RATES?

Clearly they have failed to heed their constituents mandates for jobs.